Latest News

matan rubin

Comparing the value of perceived humanversus AI-generated empathy

16 July, 2025

new paper published in Nature Human Behaviour by Matan Rubin, Prof. Anat Perry, and colleagues, explores whether empathic responses are perceived differently when attributed to a human versus artificial intelligence.

Across nine studies with over 6,000 participants, the researchers found that identically generated empathic messages were rated as more empathic, supportive, and authentic when thought to come from a human.

oded leshem

Congratulation to Dr. Oded Adomi Leshem

2 July, 2025

Who won ISPP’s 2025 David O. Sears Best Book Award for his book "Hope Amidst Conflict: Philosophical and Psychological Explorations," Published by Oxford University Press.

Leshem is a senior researcher at the PICR lab and the founder of the new International Hub for Hope Research.

David O. Sears Best Book on Mass Politics Award

Amir Tal

Welcome Dr. Amir Tal

24 June, 2025

The Department of Psychology is excited to welcome Dr. Amir Tal, a new faculty member joining the department in collaboration with the Department of Cognitive Science and the Brain. Amir will join us in the upcoming academic year (2025–2026) and will lead the Computational Psychology cluster.

More

Filter News by Month

Language can, sometimes, impair precise visual memory

9 February, 2022
Language can, sometimes, impair precise visual memory

The relation between language and the way we perceive and remember the world has attracted philosophers and scientists for decades. Language is known to influence the processing of visual information. However, little is known about the effect of verbal coding of a perceived object on processing and maintenance of visual memories. Haggar Cohen-Dallal and Noa Rahamim-Elyakim from Yoni Pertzov’s lab, in collaboration with Nachum Soroker from Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, took a classic neuropsychologic approach to examine this question by testing stroke patients with aphasia - a common language deficit following stroke. Patients with aphasia typically have trouble to name objects. Here we compared the patients’ memory performance for objects they could and couldn’t name. The results imply a counterintuitive effect of verbal coding – it seems to worsen the precision of memory of the location of objects. The findings point to an interaction between the verbal and visuospatial components of working memory. The results can be explained by the prototypical-categorical nature of language-derived designations (names, common nouns) of visual objects, which are not precise enough for capturing fine details of objects, and specifically their exact location. Thus, language can, sometimes, impair precise visual memory.

See full article here